[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: /tmp as tmpfs and consequence for imaging software



also sprach Lars Wirzenius <liw@liw.fi> [2011.11.13.1204 +0100]:
> A fixed policy is going to interact badly with real systems and
> per-site decisions about, say, disk partitioning and provisioining
> of RAM for various purposes.
>
> The proper policy, IMHO, is that a) all software that uses temporary
> files should obey TMPDIR if set (and fall back on /tmp if not)
> and b) all software must deal with out-of-disk-space errors in a
> sensible way (where the exact details may depend on the software).

Fully agreed.

Please do not try to (ab)use policy to tell me how I have to
administer/manage my systems. Use policy to dictate how programs we
provide as part of The Debian System must behave.

I would welcome if TMPDIR-related bugs and bugs related to
temporary file handling would become release-critical.

I think it's great that Debian provides the flexibility to easily
make /tmp a tmpfs. However, I don't think that should be the
default (cf. RAMRUN, RAMLOCK).

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
people with narrow minds usually have broad tongues.

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)


Reply to: