[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome

On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:56:53PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We should do it when we judge that the benefits are worth the costs.
> In this particular case the costs seem to be minimal.  There isn't
> even a direct patch-carrying cost, since the dependency is expressed
> in our own control files.

What should it be called: gnome-without-network-manager?

I really don't like evolution.  Can I have a gnome-without-evolution?

(Only half-joking. I *really* don't like evolution).

Where do you draw the line?

(Of course, any Debian developer can freely create such a dependency package,
it doesn't have to be the GNOME maintainers.)

In case it isn't clear, I don't think it's a good idea.

Jon Dowland

Reply to: