Re: Bug#645656: network-manager in Gnome
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:56:53PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> We should do it when we judge that the benefits are worth the costs.
> In this particular case the costs seem to be minimal. There isn't
> even a direct patch-carrying cost, since the dependency is expressed
> in our own control files.
What should it be called: gnome-without-network-manager?
I really don't like evolution. Can I have a gnome-without-evolution?
(Only half-joking. I *really* don't like evolution).
Where do you draw the line?
(Of course, any Debian developer can freely create such a dependency package,
it doesn't have to be the GNOME maintainers.)
In case it isn't clear, I don't think it's a good idea.