Re: Re: ifupdown package interfaces include function
Fabian Greffrath, le Wed 31 Aug 2011 16:21:34 +0200, a écrit :
> >ifupdown 0.7~alpha5 was uploaded to unstable rather than experimental by
> >mistake. Since version numbers aren't allowed to go backwards, we now
> >have 0.7~alpha5+really0.6.15 in unstable, but for the purposes of
>
> Don't we have epochs for this? I know they are annoying and should be
> avoided, but they are still a blessing compared to the current confused
> versioning scheme.
Epochs are permanent annoying things, while this kind of confusion is
only temporary.
Samuel
Reply to: