Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) [110829 20:42]:
> Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> writes:
> > Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 16:49:17 +0200, a écrit :
> 
> >> Those packages should be set Not-For-Us anyway, no? So they still need
> >> an action from porters or buildd maintainers.
> 
> > We want to avoid Not-For-Us. Maintainers should simply set the
> > architecture list.
> 
> Does this work now?  Previously, setting the architecture list didn't do
> anything useful if the source package built at least one arch: all
> package.

That should be changed some months ago. If not, please give me an
example package and I'll fix it.


Andi