Re: Maintainers, porters, and burden of porting

[Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>]

Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> writes:
> Lucas Nussbaum, le Mon 29 Aug 2011 16:49:17 +0200, a écrit :

>> Those packages should be set Not-For-Us anyway, no? So they still need
>> an action from porters or buildd maintainers.

> We want to avoid Not-For-Us. Maintainers should simply set the
> architecture list.

Does this work now?  Previously, setting the architecture list didn't do
anything useful if the source package built at least one arch: all
package.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>