[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Buildd vs. Cowbuilder: broken symlink in procps dev package on one architecture

Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org> (22/08/2011):
> 1) What's the proper way to address this issue in squeeze?
>    a) Build a i386 package with broken symlink?
>    b) Build whatever-arch package with working symlink?

Stop using basename on what's in /lib, and do that on what's under
> 2) How can we make sure such a bug doesn't happen again
>    (besides working towards source-only uploads :))?
>    Bugreport against buildd.debian.org?

Same answer as for 1).


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: