Re: Bug#634015: Proposition to team-maintain m2crypto.
Package: python-m2crypto
Severity: serious
>
> That may take a little more time, as I noted that demo/x509/proxylib.py is not
> free:
>
> ############################################################################
> # Matt Rodriguez, LBNL
> #Copyright (c) 2003, The Regents of the University of California,
> #through Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
> #(subject to receipt of any required approvals from the U.S. Dept. of Energy).
> #All rights reserved.
> ############################################################################
>
> Of course, this file is not used at build time and is not distributed in our
> binary packages, but if I understand well our procedures, I can not knowingly
> upload a package that contains this file.
>
> Hence the question to the other developers: is it necessary to correct m2crypto
> source package in Stable ? Not that I am interested to do it – you know my
> position on these files is that they should be documented but ignored otherwise
> (see http://lists.debian.org/20100124144741.GD13468@kunpuu.plessy.org ). So
> if the answer is yes, can somebody volunteer to do the work ?
>
> Have a nice day,
>
> --
> Charles Plessy
> Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
>
>
It's certainly necessary for us to not distribute stuff which is not
distributable. I'm therefore BCCing submit@bugs.debian.org, as this
should be a separate bug from the wishlist bug this is currently
attached to.
stew
Reply to: