Re: Bug#634015: Proposition to team-maintain m2crypto.
Le Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:37:22PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> Le Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 11:58:48PM +0100, Dima Barsky a écrit :
> >
> > Sorry for the delay, I was away for a while. I have to admit, I have not paid
> > much attention to m2crypto lately, so if you or anybody else wants to pick it
> > up I would not mind at all. If there are no volunteers I'll have a look at the
> > bug reports and upload a new version in the next week or two.
>
> Hi Dima,
>
> thanks for the answer ! I will go ahead with the upload soon.
That may take a little more time, as I noted that demo/x509/proxylib.py is not
free:
############################################################################
# Matt Rodriguez, LBNL
#Copyright (c) 2003, The Regents of the University of California,
#through Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
#(subject to receipt of any required approvals from the U.S. Dept. of Energy).
#All rights reserved.
############################################################################
Of course, this file is not used at build time and is not distributed in our
binary packages, but if I understand well our procedures, I can not knowingly
upload a package that contains this file.
Hence the question to the other developers: is it necessary to correct m2crypto
source package in Stable ? Not that I am interested to do it – you know my
position on these files is that they should be documented but ignored otherwise
(see http://lists.debian.org/20100124144741.GD13468@kunpuu.plessy.org ). So
if the answer is yes, can somebody volunteer to do the work ?
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Reply to: