Re: A few observations about systemd
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Guus Sliepen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> By the way, we already have the SysV init scripts, so we don't need to do
> anything to keep supporting that, while it will take some time before every
> package with a daemon has the required systemd scripts in place, I think we
> should wait with any switch until there is at least enough coverage.
> If you think your comparison is suitable, then are you suggesting we do
> something as difficult as moving from .deb format to .rpm?
> I'm sure systemd won't be free of problems either. So lets first work on
> getting daemon packages to support systemd, and then see if the result is good
> enough to switch to systemd by default.
That makes no sense, please do some research. systemd supports SysV
init scripts, there's absolutely no need to "wait until packages
What *is* needed is specified here: