On Jul 20, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote: > Having concluded from this thread that 1) kfreebsd is important to > Debian and 2) systemd is important for Debian, the question cannot be I think that both statements are not so much obvious, but anyway... > which one we choose between the two, but HOW we achieve both with the > least pain possible. A more interesting question is: if systemd or upstart were adopted, would the kFreeBSD porters be willing to implement everything needed to support on their ports the packages using a non-traditional init configuration, in the way they consider appropriate and without causing a significant burden on the other ports? I think that a clear statement from the kFreeBSD porters about this would help concluding this debate. -- ciao, Marco
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature