Hello, On Tue, 31 May 2011 12:21:26 +0200 Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> wrote: > > > Especially Darcs is rightly famous for its user-friendly interface > > Are you kidding? :) > Your quoting lets me wonder: Do you really doubt that Darcs’s general > user interface is more intuitive than others (especially compared to > git)? Darcs might have its shortcomings, but its UI is always pointed > out as a plus Well, I really dislike git's interface, but darcs appears to be completely counter-intuitive to me. Possibly, I have used it too little, or I'm used to Mercurial too much, don't know. > But even then I find Darcs’s interface much more clear than the > interactive hunk selection interface provided by git. Possibly. I haven't seen both yet, but I like how `hg record`/`hg qrecord` works. If darcs provides anything better --- well, good for it, possibly, it needs to be ported to other version control systems, too :) -- WBR, Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature