Re: Bug#625865: ITP: ocportal -- ocPortal is a Content Management System for building and maintaining a dynamic website
On 05/06/2011 02:39 PM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> I was responding to someone who said I 'supported' inclusion of proposed
Ah, I misunderstood. My apologies.
> Yeah, good point. So it's not enough for packager to say he will be
> responsive to problems?
Packages, once uploaded, enter the Debian ecosystem and therefore
involve some time from many others: the security team, the ftpmasters,
the release managers, BSP participants, etc. as well as consuming
resources (archive space, autobuild time, etc.) So the cost needs to be
justified by the value to Debian. If there is no perceived value, the
package should not be added to the archive.
> As I've mentioned elsewhere on this thread, it's not kool to just say
> 'no', without stating why.
Huh. I thought Joss did say why. It's a CMS. It's PHP. That's why. :)
(and maybe that's not enough for you, but those are reasons *I* wouldn't
invest time in such an endeavour.)
> I'm lost there. What you mean about the mirror thing, and about the
> sarcasm thing? Where did I use sarcasm?
If referring to Joss as "The great Josselin Mouette" was sincere and not
sarcasm, then my mistake. It had the appearance of a jab.