[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Berkeley DB plan for future

True, it was already pointed that kfreebsd* is the rare case. s/fixed/checked/ in my previous text and attach your bullet.

Ondřej Surý

On 27.4.2011, at 20:16, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> 4. Build-Depends - Depends (aka invalid listing in Build-Depends)
>> http://wiki.debian.org/BerkeleyDB/InvalidBuild-Depends
>> Packages in list 4 should be fixed because it means either one of:
>> 1. The Build-Depends listing is erroneous (f.e. upstream dropped
>> support for Berkeley DB)
>> 2. The build process is broken (f.e. aka doesn't recognize libdb5.1)
>> and needs fixing.
> 3. needs bdb during build to do something, but the build product doesn't
>   use bdb?  Should be rare, though.
> -- 
>  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
>  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
>  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
>  Henrique Holschuh

Reply to: