Re: Berkeley DB plan for future
True, it was already pointed that kfreebsd* is the rare case. s/fixed/checked/ in my previous text and attach your bullet.
On 27.4.2011, at 20:16, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Ondřej Surý wrote:
>> 4. Build-Depends - Depends (aka invalid listing in Build-Depends)
>> Packages in list 4 should be fixed because it means either one of:
>> 1. The Build-Depends listing is erroneous (f.e. upstream dropped
>> support for Berkeley DB)
>> 2. The build process is broken (f.e. aka doesn't recognize libdb5.1)
>> and needs fixing.
> 3. needs bdb during build to do something, but the build product doesn't
> use bdb? Should be rare, though.
> "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
> them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
> where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
> Henrique Holschuh