Re: MBF Re: Bug#621277: ggz-grubby: Getting rid of unneeded *.la / emptying dependency_libs
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 19:13:43 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2011-04-06 email@example.com wrote:
> > Package: ggz-grubby
> > Severity: normal
> > User: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Usertags: la-file-removal
> > To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
> > 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
> > against packages which contain .la files which can be either removed
> > or stripped of the dependency_libs variable.
> Please stop this mass bug filing.
> a) There were duplicate bugs filed.
> b) Bugs were filed for issues recently solved.
> c) The bugs reports are unversioned.
> I can completely understand that a and b can occassionally happen due
> to timing issues. However imnsho a MBF with unversioned bug-reports is
> not acceptable.
Ack. Also I think this should simply be a lintian check, there's no
need to have a mass bug filing about it.