[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Question about the version of debian



On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 09:19 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 13 avril 2011 à 14:02 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit : 
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 20:47 +0800, YANG,Chao wrote:
> > > dpkg --print-architecture shows
> > > i386.
> > > 
> > > However, uname -a shows
> > > x86-64
> > > 
> > > what does this mean?
> > 
> > It means Asias He was right.  And this is a perfectly valid
> > configuration (though it confuses some third-party installers).
> > 
> > But I think this is a bug in the configuration of the CD/DVD creation:
> > the amd64 flavour is on DVD 1 but the 686-bigmem flavour is on DVD 2.
> > The latter definitely should be on DVD 1 (and CD 1 or 2, rather than CD
> > 10!).
> 
> How is that a problem? An overwhelming majority of CPUs today are amd64,
> and even if you choose to install a i386 userland (there are various
> good reasons for that), you still want an amd64 kernel to benefit of all
> your CPU can offer.

There are compatibility issues with third-party scripts that rely on
'uname -m' to select which architecture to use in userland.  And there
are still a few places where 32-bit compatibility wrappers are missing
in the kernel.  Personally, I do use this combination, but I'm not ready
to recommend it in general.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: