[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Moving bash from essential/required to important?

Luk Claes <luk@debian.org> (04/04/2011):
> The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important
> is obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash when
> it's used in a package. Which means quite some packages will need to
> be changed.

What is the most obvious reason to degrade bash to Priority: important?

(I can understand shell maintainers would like to get bash out of
their way, but how many (other) people really want to get rid of it?)


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: