[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Moving bash from essential/required to important?

On Monday 04 April 2011 18.04:20 Luk Claes wrote:
> The most obvious reason to not degrade bash to Priority: important is
> obviously that one needs to declare a dependency on bash when it's used
> in a package. Which means quite some packages will need to be changed.

Do you have any kind of estimate how many peopl would need to depend on 

If it's a few hundred: no problem, why not tackle this as a wheezy release 
goal. If it's 4000, don't bother.

-- vbi

featured product: the GNU Compiler Collection - http://gcc.gnu.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: