On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:42:25 +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > So if a vague freeze date (such as "Fall 2011") is all we get now, we still > need a firmer *future* date, nearer the time (e.g., "Freeze on Halloween", > announced late August), to allow this sort of work cycle to happen. > I think that was part of what Carsten was saying. Cheers, Julien