Re: problem with /etc/kernel scripts
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: problem with /etc/kernel scripts
- From: Harald Dunkel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:31:42 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4D98BD0E.email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <1301577731.10056.120.camel@localhost>
- References: <4D8621EC.firstname.lastname@example.org> <1300641831.26693.289.camel@localhost> <4D86DF5F.email@example.com> <1300713743.26693.346.camel@localhost> <4D94425B.firstname.lastname@example.org> <1301577731.10056.120.camel@localhost>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 03/31/11 15:22, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 10:59 +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>> Of course I understand that this is highly complex. Maybe it would help to
>> introduce some scheme to register event handlers to run after the installation
>> of all packages has been completed?
> We had an extensive discussion defining a policy for the kernel and
> initramfs builder hooks only last year. It's a little late to comment
Two points about this:
- - this is not a comment. Check my first message in this thread:
Something tries to build a kernel module before the headers are
installed. This is a bug. See #574758.
- - last year was Squeeze. Now we are working on Wheezy. In 12 months
when it is close to code freeze it will be too late. Today is the
right time to clean this up.
I would be glad to help.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----