Re: Upcoming changes in Lintian & some bits
testing with the version from experimental yielded the following additional
messages compared to unstable (all overrides were correctly detected).
W: openswan-doc: spelling-error-in-readme-debian allows to allows one to
W: openswan-modules-source: spelling-error-in-readme-debian allows to allows one to
W: openswan: spelling-error-in-readme-debian allows to allows one to
I: openswan: spelling-error-in-binary usr/lib/ipsec/pluto ouput output
W: openswan-modules-dkms: spelling-error-in-readme-debian allows to allows one to
Btw. packages tested were openswan and amavisd-milter.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:07:09AM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 22:47 -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> >> As a consequence of these changes, the new Lintian release will cause
> >> many existing overrides to no longer apply. We recognise that this will
> >> lead to some noise in the short term but are convinced that the longer
> >> term advantages make this worthwhile.
> > Did you do an archive check with the new lintian and diff'ed it against
> > a check with previous lintian?
> No, we haven't.
> An archive check is running as I type, that's the easy part. However, the
> results need to be checked, and even though Niels already volunteered to
> take a look, I expect the diff to be quite big.
> More eyes, and hands, are welcome; installing the RC and starting with one's
> packages would be great.
> Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
> www.debian.org - get.debian.net
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com
> Archive: [🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] email@example.com