Quoting Neil McGovern (neil@halon.org.uk): > Yes, it would. And so would expecting people to read the mail. Given I think that what confused people is that former calls for votes had this Reply-To field setup. Thankfully you did send this mail so, when time came to vote (after reading the GR), I was aware about being careful and thus did not mess up (hopefully)....but I suspect that many just did as they did in earlier vote and, thus, the ballot ended in your mailbox..:-) I'm sure there are reasons for the Reply-To field to not be setup this time and I accept them (in short: no criticism intended), but that might be a reason for erroneous votes received.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature