Am 02.07.2010 08:57, schrieb Joerg Jaspert:
>>> The above URL has the license. I think that the concepts in the preamble are
>>> interesting, offering software to please Allah and denying the concept of
>>> "ownership" of Intellectual Property.
>> Which is not only non-free in Debian, we can not distribute it.
>> A software license is not allowed to force other users to please any "god".
>
> Yes, we can very well distribute a software in non-free that requires
> the user to do whatever funny thing the license author wants from him.
> It is the users problem in non-free if they can follow that or
> not. Debian does only require the distribution rights, and I do not see
> how they are affected in such a thing. How much sense it makes and what
> I personally think of license authors (hint: nothing good at all, DO NOT
> WRITE ANY NEW LICENSE, DAMNIT), is something else.
>
Okay thanks for the correctur :)
--
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatthaei@debian.org
patrick@linux-dev.org
Comment:
Always if we think we are right,
we were maybe wrong.
*/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature