Re: UPG and the default umask

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: UPG and the default umask
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:52:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 201005171052.49183.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] b55a9e6f8550f98651d95aea9e5c4a9e@imap.dd24.net>
References: <[🔎] 4BE830C8.5050009@gmail.com> <[🔎] 201005171031.44818.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] b55a9e6f8550f98651d95aea9e5c4a9e@imap.dd24.net>

On Montag, 17. Mai 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> But I guess non of them wouldn't be received enthusiastically, would they?

you suggested something else in your previous mail...

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

References:
- UPG and the default umask
  - From: Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce@gmail.com>
- Re: UPG and the default umask
  - From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Re: UPG and the default umask
  - From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>

Prev by Date: Re: UPG and the default umask
Next by Date: Bug#581926: ITP: django-reversion -- Provides comprehensive version control facilities for Django
Previous by thread: Re: UPG and the default umask
Next by thread: Re: UPG and the default umask
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread