Re: UPG and the default umask

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
Subject: Re: UPG and the default umask
From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:31:44 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 201005171031.44818.holger@layer-acht.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 17db8d7d1bc34528f0eea9fa032ab2b7@imap.dd24.net>
References: <[🔎] 4BE830C8.5050009@gmail.com> <[🔎] hspqv6$qie$1@dough.gmane.org> <[🔎] 17db8d7d1bc34528f0eea9fa032ab2b7@imap.dd24.net>

Hi,

On Montag, 17. Mai 2010, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> May I suggest the following:

how about you file bugs _with patches_? Talk is cheap.


cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UPG and the default umask
  - From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>

References:
- UPG and the default umask
  - From: Aaron Toponce <aaron.toponce@gmail.com>
- Re: UPG and the default umask
  - From: Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com>
- Re: UPG and the default umask
  - From: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Re: Open then gates
Next by Date: Bug#581919: openssh-server: "bad ownership or modes for file $HOME/.ssh/authorized_keys" check too aggressive
Previous by thread: Re: UPG and the default umask
Next by thread: Re: UPG and the default umask
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread