On Thursday 13 May 2010 18:39:46 Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Why is this relevant? If you remove a POSIX-defined utility from $PATH, > your system is no longer POSIX-compliant, not to mention a fully-working > Debian system. Strange that now being POSIX-compliant is important but it isn't when we talk about bindv6only... > And handling bindv6only is absolutely trivial. Right, but there are many others sysctl options, why should the apps deal with this particular one and not with the others? If you start thinking about _all_ the combinations of kernel settings, maybe the task of dealing with them all will not look trivial anymore to you? Bye -- Salvo Tomaselli
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.