[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available



On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Harald Jenny
<harald@a-little-linux-box.at> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 06:11:28PM -0600, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> On 17/11/10 at 22:34 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
>> > Hello Lucas,
>> >
>> > concerning the openswan* packages:
>> >
>> > http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/openswan.log:
>> >
>> >    Configuration file `/etc/ipsec.conf'
>> >     ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
>> >     ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
>> >       What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
>> >        Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
>> >        N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
>> >          D     : show the differences between the versions
>> >          Z     : background this process to examine the situation
>> >     The default action is to keep your current version.
>> >    *** ipsec.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing openswan (--configure):
>> >     EOF on stdin at conffile prompt
>> >     .
>> >     .
>> >     .
>> >    Errors were encountered while processing:
>> >     openswan
>> >    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>> >
>> > I guess this problem arises because we need user input here, correct?
>>
>> Yes, but you shouldn't, since the file installed in lenny was not modified, so it's a bug somewhere.
>
> Well I'm fairly new to the maintainance of this package but I would guess the
> postinst of lenny modifies ipsec.conf...

It does[0].  This was filed as #515098 and #515095, which was fixed post-Lenny.

[0]: http://ur1.ca/2dja1
-- 
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan@debian.org>


Reply to: