Re: Full install/removal/upgrade test results available

[Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>]

On 17/11/10 at 22:34 +0100, Harald Jenny wrote:
> Hello Lucas,
> 
> concerning the openswan* packages:
> 
> http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/openswan.log:
> 
>    Configuration file `/etc/ipsec.conf'
>     ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
>     ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
>       What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
>        Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
>        N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
>          D     : show the differences between the versions
>          Z     : background this process to examine the situation
>     The default action is to keep your current version.
>    *** ipsec.conf (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing openswan (--configure):
>     EOF on stdin at conffile prompt
> 	.
> 	.
> 	.
>    Errors were encountered while processing:
>     openswan
>    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> 
> I guess this problem arises because we need user input here, correct?

Yes, but you shouldn't, since the file installed in lenny was not modified, so it's a bug somewhere.

> http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/11/17/openswan-modules-dkms.log:
> 
>    dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 (--remove):
>     subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 1
> 	.
> 	.
> 	.
>    Errors were encountered while processing:
>     linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64
>    E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> 
> And here it's the already mentioned kernel issue, am I right?

Right

- Lucas