On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 17:12:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > > > > So what backports "priority" actually says is "my package is such a > > bullshit that I don't want it ever released, but I am fine with putting > > burden on the people keeping backports running instead". I think we have > > a way already dealing with this: Don't upload them. > > These packages are not that bad, since the FTP team accepted them… > As far as I can tell the FTP team bases its accept/reject decisions on whether it's legal for us to distribute a package (and whether it's suitable for the component it was uploaded to in terms of the dfsg), not whether it's a good idea to put that package in the distribution. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature