Re: Backports service becoming official
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Russ Allbery <email@example.com> wrote:
> If there's any complexity in the backport, that's probably true. But I'll
> note here that for all the backports I do for my packages, all the changes
> in the backport are mechanical (and automated) and maintaining that in a
> VCS is just more trouble than it's worth, so I don't bother.
That is another thing I had wanted; automated rebuild-only backports
for those cases where shibs were bumped or similar.