Le samedi 26 juin 2010 à 14:07 +0200, Marc Haber a écrit : > >The footnote to Policy 3.5, where this is written out? > > Ah, so this is the same as the no-circular-dependency rule, dumping > extra error proneness and extra thoughtweight on all developers to > work around shortcomings in our software? AIUI it is here because the no-circular-dependency rule isn’t enforced enough. Furthermore, I’d be interested to know how to fix such a “shortcoming” in our software. If both A and B depend on each other, A.postinst must be executed before B.postinst, and vice versa. Please show me an algorithm to do that that doesn’t rely on a timeshifting device. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part