Re: A lot of pending packages
On 11/06/2010 09:54, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Right, I was being silly. Also, the word "experimental" adds more fear
> to the user than just "devel", which is good. Let me rephrase then. How
> about we accept MORE packages with LESS checks in Experimental, and have
> new maintainers forced in that repository, then if they are seen as
> responsive, we upload to SID? Could that be a sponsor's decision already
> right now, and be considered a good practice?
I disagree with this new proposed used of experimental. If you do this,
you will end up with newbies using experimental to get new stuff and
breaking their system to us a big on-going transition in experimental.
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 email@example.com
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo: deb http://perso.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main