Il giorno Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:37:26 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> ha scritto: > > * 1 package has temporary dependency screwup > What specifically does "temporary dependency screwup" mean? http://people.debian.org/~dktrkranz/scons-2.0/depwait/gtkrsync_1.0.4-sid-i386-20100604-075618.22.log gtkrsync requires some build-dependencies conflicting each other. I didn't spend a lot of time on this specific issue, so I'm not able to say where the problem is right now. > > I have already informed upstream of my rebuild tests, and I hopefully > > will be given instructions on how to properly fix FTBFSes, which I will > > report as important bugs against affected packages. SCons 2.0 release > > should happen in June, if RT does not mind, I intend to upload 2.0 to > > unstable shortafter. > > I'm assuming that this is "just" a new upstream version? i.e. once the > FTBFS packages are fixed and assuming no RC issues in scons itself > appear, there'd be no need for any explicit action from the Release Team > and SCons 2.0 would simply transition to testing once its 10 days were > up? Exactly, given that several packages build-depend on SCons, and there could be some hidden aspects I'm not aware of, informing RT in advance could avoid additional headache to team members :) -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org> `. `' `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature