[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

setgid umask override versus global umask change

What, I wonder, would be the consequences of setgid directories
overring umask, rather than a system wide umask change?

We could leave umask set to 0022 but when creating files and
directories in setgid directories the 0020 bit of the umask
would itself be masked out.

This would seem to localize the change to where it is needed,
thus reducing the possibility for accidental security holes.

Setgid already does much wierdness.  Adding this small extra
wierdness would not be inelegant.

This would seem to be a trival kernel patch, whether implemented
alone or together with a /sys control to enable/disable it.

Can anyone see any downside?

--Mike Bird

Reply to: