[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Meaning of the different “format” fields and files.



On Sat, 29 May 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. I sent a patch for the Policy to this bug report. I
> agree with the comment of Manoj in message #15 that the Format field of the
> Debian source control files would have better been called Src-Format or
> something similar. Do you think that there is a chance to correct this in the
> future?

It's unlikely, it's a complication with no clear benefit.

> The patch I sent indicates the meaning of the Format field for the Debian
> change files and source control files, and brings the Policy up to date with
> the format 1.8 for Debian changes files. I did not address the meaning of the
> Format field in source package control files, because I do not understand why
> the debian/source/format file was introduced to replace the use of that field.

It's not replaced... the field is still here in the .dsc, but its content
is generated by dpkg-source (and the source format specific part) based on
debian/source/format or the --format command-line option.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog

Like what I do? Sponsor me: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/05/5-years-of-freexian/
My Debian goals: http://ouaza.com/wp/2010/01/09/debian-related-goals-for-2010/


Reply to: