Re: UPG and the default umask
Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> writes:
> Besides, if the requirement is to be able to create files in certain
> directories with group permissions (I think that is what this is about,
> but only skimming), can't you do something with default ACLs that do the
> same thing on given directories without the extra complexity to the
> groups?
> Or have I got this wrong?
You can do similar things with POSIX ACLs. There's some disagreement over
which one is extra complexity. :)
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: