> One of my concerns about upstart is that systems that want to > use SELinux and upstart _have_ to also use an initramfs, which is yet > another component of the system that has to be audited. There have > been patches proposed, and semi-rejected b the upstart folks, who are > of the opinions that only systems using initramfs need apply. > Have to jump in here, but this is simply not true. I have never rejected any SELinux patches for Upstart; I have simply never been *sent* any. I've always said I'm quite happy to sit down with the SELinux folks and work out the right way to do this. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part