Re: Naming policy for Perl modules (mass bug filing)
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Ansgar Burchardt <email@example.com> wrote:
> Ansgar Burchardt <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> the Debian Perl Policy asks for packages for the Foo::Bar module to be
>> named libfoo-bar-perl . Some packages do not adhere to this scheme:
>> Unless there are objections I will file bugs of severity "normal" in a
>> few days for these packages.
> The bugs are now filed with severity "wishlist" and user-tagged.
> A list can be obtained from .
>  <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=perl-naming-policy;email@example.com>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
> Archive: [🔎] email@example.com">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] firstname.lastname@example.org
Philosophical question: When does this sort of thing get taken care
of? In twenty years, will Debian (if it's still going) have myriad
misnamed libraries? I know one can
Shouldn't housecleaning like this be of higher priority, especially
say, when a new version has just been put out? That way, maintainers
would have months to slowly work on one package (and its associated
reverse-dependencies) at a time.
I do not know the technical constraints (no autobuild, etc), but
consistency is a valuable trait of an operating system.