Re: Team uploads.
Jan Hauke Rahm <email@example.com> writes:
> Not quite. 5.12 recommends a way to deal with team maintenance but is
> not enough here. Reading 5.12 (list as maintainer, the one who feels
> responsible as uploader) still allows having no uploader when noone
> feels responsible.
> I'd like to see a clear and unmistakle sentence somewhere (i.e. policy
> or devref) saying that a package should have a real person as maintainer
> or uploader. But now that I think of it, this is not necessarily related
> to what Charles proposes.
Agreed on both counts.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>