[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#572480: sdcv: Please build-depend on autopoint



On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Michal ?iha? wrote:

> Hi
> 
> Dne Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:46:11 +0100 (CET)
> Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> napsal(a):
> 
> > Sorry for not following developers-reference to the letter.
> > 
> > I asked in debian-release, and I got the okay from one of the release
> > managers to report the bugs.
> 
> Okay, in this case it would be helpful to include link to this in the
> bug report, because the bug report really does not contain much
> information why it should be done and why it is important:
> 
> http://bugs.debian.org/572481
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00298.html

Agreed, and sorry for not having included such information. I'll try
to do that if I have to send more reports for a missing package.

Those who have read the previous README.Debian in gettext, however,
will understand easily why this is being done.

> Also there are probably some packages missing from your bug reports,
> because geeqie also build-depends on cvs and it did not get the bug

It's ok that geeqie did not receive a report. Not all packages having
"build-depends: cvs" are involved.

Bug reports have been sent only to those of them who actually used
autopoint during a test build.

There might be missing reports if the package build-depends on cvs
in an indirect way, i.e. package A build-depends on B and package B
depends (directly or indirectly) on cvs.

If anybody knows of a case like that, I would be interested.

Thanks.


Reply to: