Hi Sandro, please don't cc: me, I'm subscribed. On Montag, 22. Februar 2010, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > I'm tempted to close this bug or reassign to reportbug ;-) > Please don't. Neither? ;) > The one above is the description of 'general' we retrieve from > , that's the canonical place for definition of pseudo-packages and > their description. > >  http://bugs.debian.org/pseudopackages/pseudo-packages.description hmm.. not sure with what to replace this example with perm 755... but noticed that "Base system general bugs" for base is also sub-optimal. At least the word "general" should be removed there.. But in general (pun intended) I wonder if its still useful to have a base and a general pseudo�e. IMO one of the two would be sufficiient. cheers, Holger
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.