Re: Possible DDPOMail improvements?
On 13/02/10 at 21:09 +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > But we are constantly wondering where we should go from there. Should we
> > add more data (like the RC bugs in stable and the unfixed security
> > issues)? Or should we instead try to decrease the amount of data (to
> > increase the signal/noise ratio), for example by not reporting about
> > Lintian errors and warnings?
> One thing that would be nice, but that is not directly related to DDPO
> messages or the PTS, though it's always when i receive the DDPO mail
> that i think about it, would be to allow upstream version tracking of
> For example, right now, for iceweasel, version 3.6 is reported as the
> last version, which is nice, but i'd also like to be able to get a
> report when 3.5.8 is going to be released, though i'd also like to keep
> the current tracking for the 3.6 versions.
Isn't that just a problem of writing your debian/watch in a way that
picks up 3.5.8 but not 3.6.X?
| Lucas Nussbaum
| firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: email@example.com GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |