Re: initial packages with multiarch paths

To: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-policy@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: initial packages with multiarch paths
From: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:20:25 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 877hqi8uau.fsf@frosties.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100212004839.GA14311@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk> (Simon McVittie's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:48:39 +0000")
References: <[🔎] 20100212004839.GA14311@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk>

Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> writes:

> While trying to prepare a multiarch version of libdbus I received some
> conflicting advice about how much of the multiarch proposal is already
> allowed by Policy, so I've prepared a multiarch version of a rather
> simpler library (libgfshare) as a starting point.
>
> Does this look OK for upload to experimental, and if not, what changes
> are needed?
>
> Regards,
>     Simon

>From a functional point it looks good.

MfG
        Goswin

Reply to:

References:
- initial packages with multiarch paths
  - From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Missing libstdc++5 for 3rd party software
Next by Date: Re: Missing libstdc++5 for 3rd party software
Previous by thread: initial packages with multiarch paths
Next by thread: Re: initial packages with multiarch paths
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread