Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 15:48 -0500 schrieb James Vega: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Thilo Six <T.Six@gmx.de> wrote: > > Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 20:34 > >> icedove-quotecolors > > > > 2nd question: > > In the good old days (when ever these were) someone like a short sighted > > person like me could search via apt or aptitude for *compatible* extentions > > to his application. > > Now does it mean, that all those xulrunner based apps can make use the same > > extensions? > > e.g. does ist make sens to use "xul-ext-quotecolors" with iceweasle? > > It does make sense to use xul-ext-quotecolors with iceape, even though > the current package forces icedove usage. With mozilla-devscripts, the package would recommend "icedove | iceape" on Debian (and "thunderbird | seamonkey" on Ubuntu). So you wouldn't be forced to install icedove.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil