[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bits from the Mozilla Extension Packaging Team

Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 15:48 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Thilo Six <T.Six@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 20:34
> >> icedove-quotecolors
> >
> > 2nd question:
> > In the good old days (when ever these were) someone like a short sighted
> > person like me could search via apt or aptitude for *compatible* extentions
> > to his application.
> > Now does it mean, that all those xulrunner based apps can make use the same
> > extensions?
> > e.g. does ist make sens to use "xul-ext-quotecolors" with iceweasle?
> It does make sense to use xul-ext-quotecolors with iceape, even though
> the current package forces icedove usage.

With mozilla-devscripts, the package would recommend "icedove | iceape"
on Debian (and "thunderbird | seamonkey" on Ubuntu). So you wouldn't be
forced to install icedove.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply to: