[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: miredo

On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:


Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Remi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


I request assistance with maintaining the miredo package.

The last update has unfortunately introduced a severe regression. That
bug was upstream, but that's hardly an excuse since I am upstream too.
In the mean time, I have lost contact of my sponsor (no answer from
emails and IRC), and haven't been able to get a new on debian-mentors.

miredo is awesome. I'm paulproteus@debian.org and paulproteus on IRC and
would love to sponsor uploads and make sure miredo in Debian is as good

Great, thanks!

Could you check if
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/miredo/miredo_1.2.2-1.dsc is

Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
What exactly do you need? Sponsorship, testing, or more active
packaging stuff?

I just need a new sponsor or a DD co-maintainer.
Packaging is OK. Testing is always welcome but I don't particularly need it
at this point.

Hey! Looks pretty good. A few questions:

* What's with the patch to src/main.c? It'd be nice if you'd explain it in debian/changelog or something.

* What's the regression that "upstream" introduced that you were concerned about?

* Have you tried building it in a clean pbuilder? That doesn't work for me. Here's the log:

gpgv: keyblock resource `/tmp/buildd/.gnupg/trustedkeys.gpg': file open error gpgv: Signature made Wed Jan 20 17:36:51 2010 UTC using DSA key ID DD6D12BD
gpgv: Can't check signature: public key not found
dpkg-source: warning: failed to verify signature on ./miredo_1.2.2-1.dsc
dpkg-source: info: extracting miredo in miredo-1.2.2
dpkg-source: info: unpacking miredo_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: applying miredo_1.2.2-1.diff.gz
dpkg-source: info: upstream files that have been modified:
I: Building the package
dpkg-buildpackage: set CFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: set CPPFLAGS to default value:
dpkg-buildpackage: set LDFLAGS to default value:
dpkg-buildpackage: set FFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: set CXXFLAGS to default value: -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: source package miredo
dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1.2.2-1
dpkg-buildpackage: source changed by Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi@remlab.net>
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture i386
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
test -x debian/rules
/usr/bin/make  -C .  -k distclean
make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/miredo-1.2.2'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/miredo-1.2.2'
make: [makefile-clean] Error 2 (ignored)
rm -f debian/stamp-makefile-build
for i in ./admin/config.guess ./admin/config.sub ./admin/config.rpath ; do \
                if test -e $i.cdbs-orig ; then \
                        mv $i.cdbs-orig $i ; \
                fi ; \
rm -f debian/cdbs-install-list debian/cdbs-package-list
rm -f debian/stamp-autotools-files
rm -f stamp-autoreconf
 dpkg-source -b miredo-1.2.2
dpkg-source: info: using source format `1.0'
dpkg-source: info: building miredo using existing miredo_1.2.2.orig.tar.gz
dpkg-source: info: building miredo in miredo_1.2.2-1.diff.gz
dpkg-source: warning: the diff modifies the following upstream files:
dpkg-source: info: use the '3.0 (quilt)' format to have separate and documented changes to upstream files, see dpkg-source(1)
dpkg-source: info: building miredo in miredo_1.2.2-1.dsc
 debian/rules build
test -x debian/rules
mkdir -p "."
autoreconf -fi
autopoint: *** cvs program not found
autopoint: *** Stop.
autoreconf: autopoint failed with exit status: 1
make: *** [stamp-autoreconf] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
E: Failed autobuilding of package
I: unmounting dev/pts filesystem
I: unmounting proc filesystem
I: cleaning the build env
I: removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//17397 and its subdirectories

So I guess you're missing a build dependency. Weird, though, since it looks more like autoreconf is the one missing the build dependency?

If you'd like help with any of this, e.g. setting up a pbuilder, let me know!

-- Asheesh.

If you really want pure ASCII, save it as text... or browse
it with your favorite browser...
		-- Alexandre Maret <amaret@infomaniak.ch>

Reply to: