[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian policy update (

Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> writes:

> Since libdbus appears in ia32-libs and isn't particularly large, and I
> wanted to make an experimental upload anyway (to add a -dbg package
> while avoiding the NEW queue blocking unstable), I've prepared a
> hopefully multiarch-compatible version of it, which uses
> /lib/${DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE} (libdbus was already in /lib, because Upstart
> uses it) and is "Multi-Arch: same". Commit mail with a diff:
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-utopia-commits/2010-January/003534.html
> Does this look appropriate for experimental? I've held off on uploading for
> now in case the multiarch cabal want to block it.
> libdbus-1-3 now contains:
> /.
> /lib
> /lib/i486-linux-gnu
> /lib/i486-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3.4.0
> /usr
> /usr/share
> /usr/share/doc
> /usr/share/doc/libdbus-1-3
> /usr/share/doc/libdbus-1-3/AUTHORS
> /usr/share/doc/libdbus-1-3/changelog.gz
> /usr/share/doc/libdbus-1-3/copyright
> /usr/share/doc/libdbus-1-3/README.gz
> /usr/share/doc/libdbus-1-3/changelog.Debian.gz
> /lib/i486-linux-gnu/libdbus-1.so.3
> Regards,
>     Simon

Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.


Reply to: