On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 12:00:25 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> wrote: > The RC bug has a patch pending and is pretty easy to fix. I might > eventually NMU it to fix that, even though I'm not willing to maintain > the package right now. Beside that bug, the package works quite well, > has a respectable number of popcon user (as you observe); I, for > instance, am a daily user of it. Just out of interest, what's the difference between doc-central and dwww ? AFAICT dwww does more via extensions to view the relevant package details as well as manpages and other content in /usr/share/doc/ that doesn't need a doc-base file. I use dwww almost constantly, never considered doc-central. I'm not saying doc-central should be removed - sounds like it just needs to be orphaned and put into QA. Just curious. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.data-freedom.org/ http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/ http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgpRbDfy4wIe9.pgp
Description: PGP signature