[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#558412: binutils-dev: Please provide libbfd_pic.a

Matthias Klose wrote:
> tags 558412 + wontfix
> thanks
> On 28.11.2009 19:10, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> Package: binutils-dev
>> Version: 2.18.1~cvs20080103-7
>> Severity: normal
>> Hash: SHA1
>> In order to solve #537744 (filed against oprofile), it is necessary for
>> binutils-dev to provide a libbfd_pic.a library.  This is like what is
>> already done for libiberity_pic.a.
> won't fix. oprofile can be built using binary NMU's when the bfd version
> changes.

I am not sure that is really a viable solution.  What do others thing?
Is requiring a binNMU of oprofile each time that the bfd version changes
something that makes sense?



Roberto C. Sánchez

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: