Re: Lintian based autorejects
Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Nov 02 11:40, Luk Claes wrote:
>> For the actual matter at hand I think it's very wrong to do a MBF
>> without going through d-devel for several reasons:
>
>> <snip reasons>
>
> Otoh, this is a slightly special case, since they are things which are
> causing the package to become non-uploadable. In this case the correct
> place to have the discussion about the scope et al of the bugs is with
> ftp-master about what constitutes rejection criteria; the bug filing is
> purely a reflection of that.
Right, though filing bugs already is ignoring that step completely.
> I certainly don't think that having packages with an upload-critical bug
> with no bug filed against them is a good idea
I'm not saying that bugs should not be filed, though the content and
meta information of bugs can be very much improved by discussing before
filing them.
Cheers
Luk
Reply to: