Re: Lintian based autorejects

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Lintian based autorejects
From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 16:34:37 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20091101153437.GB23811@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20091101152039.GA23811@debian.org>
References: <87skd5extc.fsf@delenn.ganneff.de> <20091027145735.GA24901@reptile.pseudorandom.co.uk> <200910311812.16234.holger@layer-acht.org> <87hbtfxwyz.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 20091101120022.GG23240@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 87skcyjosa.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> <[🔎] 20091101152039.GA23811@debian.org>

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (01/11/2009):
> Then you probably should read Policy 7.1.1. Individual checks or
> non-automation doesn't make it less massive.

Make it DevRef (thanks, Kumar).

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Lintian based autorejects
  - From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
- Re: Lintian based autorejects
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org>
- Re: Lintian based autorejects
  - From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#553622: ITP: colorcode -- advanced clone of the MasterMind game
Next by Date: Re: Lintian based autorejects
Previous by thread: Re: Lintian based autorejects
Next by thread: Re: Lintian based autorejects
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread