Romain Beauxis wrote: > Le Friday 20 March 2009 19:55:29 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort, vous avez écrit : >>> Since the vast majority of the packages fall into a regular copyright and >>> licensing, this would also mean overload the policy with stuff that is >>> only relevant in a very small number of cases in proportion. >> If copyright holder listing isn't needed at all, there's no special-casing >> needed for autofoo stuff (wrt copyright listing, not wrt licenses though). > > But this is also problematic for license ! > > Even in the case in which we accept my above rational, it is still possible > that the configure.ac contains custom macros with a bad license... > > Hence, if we were to decide on a general basis, it would be either to check > for all configure.ac or for no one.. Do you think one of these possibilities > is reasonable ? I dunno, but that is not the point. The point is about not requiring copyright holders, which wouldn't need special casing. Emilio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature